3.4(A) — Number Operations: Solve with fluency one-step and two-step problems involving multiplication and division within 100 using strategies based on the properties of operations and place-value understandings
Like this lesson plan? Generate one for your class — free, no signup required.
Generate a lesson like this 3rd Grade · Math · pre-filled for youProject 4 real-world images: egg cartons (2 rows × 6), a parking lot grid (5 rows × 8), flower petals on a daisy (petals × daisies), juice boxes in a 4-pack. Students write one multiplication equation for each image.
Whole-group share-out. Teacher writes student equations on the board and asks: "What do all of these have in common?" Guide students to the key idea: equal groups. Connect the visual to the equation: 2 rows × 6 eggs = 12 eggs. Activate the skip-counting anchor chart from the previous lesson.
Images beat abstract numbers here. Students who struggle to recall multiplication facts can almost always count equal groups — use that as a bridge. When a student gives repeated addition (6+6=12) instead of 2×6=12, affirm the strategy and show how it connects to the multiplication equation. Don't jump to correcting the notation — honor the math, then upgrade the language.
Model the same problem (4×7=?) using three strategies side by side on the whiteboard: (1) Skip counting by 7s on the number line — 7, 14, 21, 28; (2) Array model — 4 rows of 7 dots; (3) Commutative property — since 4×7 = 7×4, students who know 7×4 already know the answer. Discuss: all three paths lead to 28.
Students copy all three strategies into a "Multiplication Toolkit" reference page in their math journal. For each strategy, they add one example of their own (not 4×7). Pair-share: which strategy do you prefer? Why?
The goal isn't for every student to use every strategy — it's for them to have options and know when to use each. Arrays are best for new facts; skip counting works when they know their 2s, 5s, and 10s; commutative property is powerful for students who know one orientation of a fact but not the other. Frame it as a "toolkit" explicitly — this language gives students ownership over their strategy choice.
Present 6 multiplication problems in a two-column table: 3×8, 6×5, 9×4, 7×3, 2×9, 10×6. Students solve each problem AND write the strategy name they used next to their work.
Students work independently for 8 minutes, then compare with a partner: Did you use the same strategy? Did you get the same answer? For any disagreement, both students show their work on a mini whiteboard and present to the teacher. Class shares two contrasting strategies for 9×4 (skip counting vs. using 10×4−4 = decomposition).
Walk the room during independent work. Look specifically for students using only repeated addition — they're correct but slow. When you spot this, don't redirect immediately. Wait until the partner comparison, then prompt: "Your partner used an array. Could you try theirs on 7×3?" If a student is skipping strategy names, that's a flag — they may not yet have internalized the strategy as a tool they can consciously choose.
Students rotate through 3 problem stations (4 minutes each): Station A — 2 multiplication word problems with manipulatives (square tiles); Station B — word problems where students write the equation AND draw the array; Station C — "missing factor" problems (3×? = 21, ?×8 = 40).
Station C is the challenge: students must reason backward. Provide a reference card with skip-counting tracks (multiples of 2–10). Students may work with a partner at Station C. Each station has a self-check answer strip students flip after completing their work — immediate feedback without teacher needed.
Missing factor problems (Station C) are TEKS 3.4A territory — they require the student to think about multiplication as a relationship, not just a procedure. Students who struggle here likely see multiplication as "multiply two numbers together" rather than "3 equal groups of how many make 21?" Prompt them: "If I have 3 groups and need 21 total, how many in each group?" Then let them use the skip-counting track.
Project two anonymous student work samples for 6×8 — one using an array (6 rows, 8 columns, counted to 48) and one using skip counting (8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48). Both are correct.
Exit ticket (index card, 3 minutes): "Which strategy is faster for 6×8? Which would you use for 6×100? Explain your thinking in 2 sentences." Collect as students exit.
This exit ticket reveals who can analyze strategies vs. who can only perform them. A student who says "skip counting is faster because I can just count by 8s" is thinking procedurally. A student who says "the array is better for visualizing the problem but skip counting is faster once you know the pattern" is thinking strategically. That's the TEKS 3.4A depth you're looking for — not just computation, but strategy selection.
Provide multiplication fact reference cards for 2s, 5s, and 10s (the "easy triples") during all activities. At Station C, reduce to missing factor problems only for 2s and 5s. For word problems, allow students to draw pictures before writing equations. Use physical square tiles rather than drawn arrays during guided practice.
Challenge: create two original word problems that require the same multiplication fact but look completely different on the surface (e.g., one about rows of seats, one about sticker pages). Then trade with a partner — can your partner write the multiplication equation without seeing the answer? Extension: investigate whether 4×3 always equals 3×4 using arrays drawn on grid paper. Write one sentence proving why.
Pre-teach: array, equal groups, factor, product, row, column using visual vocabulary cards with Spanish cognates (factor/factor, product/producto). Allow bilingual work on exit ticket. During word problems, draw a small picture next to each problem showing the context (egg cartons, chairs in rows). Pair ELL students with bilingual partners during Station C.
Station work graded on 4-point scale: 4 = correct answers + strategy named for every problem; 3 = mostly correct + strategies named; 2 = partial (errors in 2+ problems or no strategies named); 1 = incomplete. Exit ticket scored on 2-point rubric: 2 = references specific strategy attributes (speed, visual clarity) + transfers to 6×100; 1 = prefers a strategy without explaining why. Missing factor Station C performance used to identify students needing fact fluency intervention before the multiplication/division unit continues.
Your topic, your class. TeachCraft builds the full TEKS-aligned plan in under 30 seconds — free, no signup required.
Generate Your Lesson Plan →